McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Clinician Article

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Modified mRNA Influenza Vaccine.



  • Fitz-Patrick D
  • McVinnie DS
  • Jackson LA
  • Crowther G
  • Geevarughese A
  • Cannon KD, et al.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 20;393(20):2001-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2416779. (Original)
PMID: 41259756
Read abstract
Disciplines
  • Infectious Disease
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 7/7
  • Family Medicine (FM)/General Practice (GP)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • General Internal Medicine-Primary Care(US)
    Relevance - 6/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7
  • Public Health
    Relevance - 5/7
    Newsworthiness - 5/7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influenza remains a major health burden despite the use of licensed vaccines. Nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) influenza vaccines have shown promising immunogenicity against influenza and an acceptable safety profile in a phase 1-2 trial.

METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 64 years to receive either a quadrivalent modRNA influenza vaccine (modRNA group) or a licensed inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (control group) during the 2022-2023 influenza season in the United States, South Africa, and the Philippines. The primary end point was relative efficacy, defined by the reduction in the percentage of participants with laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with influenza-like illness at least 14 days after vaccination with the modRNA vaccine, as compared with the control vaccine, and analyzed for noninferiority and superiority. Immunogenicity was evaluated by means of a hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. We assessed reactogenicity within 7 days after vaccination, adverse events through 1 month, and serious adverse events through 6 months. We assessed vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety in the modRNA group.

RESULTS: A total of 18,476 participants underwent randomization: 9225 were assigned to receive the modRNA vaccine and 9251 to receive the control vaccine. The relative efficacy of the modRNA vaccine as compared with the control vaccine against influenza-like illness was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4 to 53.9) on the basis of 57 cases in the modRNA group and 87 cases in the control group, a finding that met the criteria for both noninferiority and superiority. Cases of influenza-like illness were caused by A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 strains but almost no B strains. The noninferiority of the antibody response on HAI assay was shown for influenza A strains but not for B strains. Primarily mild or moderate reactogenicity was observed in both vaccine groups but was reported more frequently in the modRNA group (overall local reactions, 70.1% vs. 43.1%; overall systemic events, 65.8% vs. 48.7%). Fever occurred in 5.6% of the participants in the modRNA group and in 1.7% of those in the control group. Adverse event profiles were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The modRNA vaccine had statistically superior efficacy over the control vaccine, with greater immune responses to A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 strains, but was associated with more reactogenicity events. (Funded by Pfizer; C4781004 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05540522.)See also in NEJM Evidence: Human clinical trial of a nucleoside-modified mRNA influenza vaccine.


Clinical Comments

Infectious Disease

This visit randomized study of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) influenza demonstrated both noninferiority and superiority compared with a standard vaccine in a pool of over 18,000 participants in North America, South Africa, and the Philippines. Participants were limited to ages 18-64. The modRNA vaccine did demonstrate a higher incidence of mild-to-moderate expected vaccine side effects such as fever, fatigue, headache, and local reactions at the injection site. Serious infections were similar in both vaccine groups. Of note, the study did not include individuals greater than 64 years of age and only 2 cases of influenza B were detected in the study participants. This trial supports the potential use of modRNA vaccines in helping address seasonal will address seasonal influenza

Public Health

The mRNA influenza vaccine was more effective than the traditional one, but it also had more side effects (e.g., pain, fatigue).

Public Health

A landmark study that is marred only by more reactivity events in the modRNA vaccine.

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register